Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Google

This Month
July 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Year Archive
Re: Demolitions were neither necessary nor sufficient to bring down the World Trade Center
by Vanna
I agree that bogus conspiracy theories muddy the investigative waters and that this benefits BushCo--and you hint that maybe the Invisible Hand might be operating. You lose me, though, when you post a silly ALUMINUM-FOIL HAT story of a thermite reaction caused by an aluminum plane contacting rusty steel girders of the WTC! This is some nutcase's stretchy story concocted to cover the enormous hole in BushCo's narrative created by the FACT that steel-girdered buildings have NEVER folded and collapsed due to heat-softened steel. Not even at temperatures MUCH higher and fires that burned MUCH longer. And by focusing on the aspect of the WTC collapse that is hardest for ANY side to prove definitively, latching onto a jerry-built ad-hoc pastiche of a non-explanation from a friend of yours, and ignoring the multiple other "coincidences" and strange occurrances mentioned by the other poster, YOU SERVE BUSHCO'S PURPOSES. I really don't like to pimp-slap people, but get a grip, girl.
Post comment:
Format Type: 
  Convert newlines
  Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject: 
   
insert bold tags insert italic tags insert underline tags insert strikethough tags insert link insert blockquote tags
Comment: 
Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
This blog does not allow anonymous comments. Please provide your username and password along with your comment.
Login information:
Username: 
Password: 
If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
Contact information:
URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com