88th in continuing blog series on the
administration push to war. As May 2003 wends on, the story of the mobile
weapons laboratories in
“
The
officials said intelligence analysts in
The Times is taking little baby steps in the
right direction here: Those ‘mobile weapons labs’ are just trailers.
Had
the sanctions been lifted in the 1990s or at the beginning of the Bush term,
the Iraqi people would have been in a stronger position to deal with Saddam
Hussein.
Same day -- The U.N. Security Council
passes a resolution directing the proceeds from Iraqi oil to be placed in a
Development Fund for
During
the year that the CPA has this authority, the Iraqi Development Fund receives
$20.2 billion, including $8.1 billion from the U.N. oil-for-food program and
$10.8 billion from Iraqi oil. A report released by the House Government Reform
Committee in February 2007 shows that from May 2003 to June 2004 the Federal
Reserve Bank in
“A dustup between two New York Times reporters over a
story on an Iraqi exile leader raises some intriguing questions about the
paper's coverage of the search for dangerous weapons thought to be hidden by
Saddam Hussein.
An internal
e-mail by Judith Miller, the paper's top reporter on bioterrorism, acknowledges
that her main source for such articles has been Ahmad Chalabi, a controversial
exile leader who is close to top Pentagon officials. Could Chalabi have been
using the Times to build a drumbeat that
The Chalabi
connection surfaced when John Burns, the paper's Pulitzer Prize-winning
(“Intra-Times Battle Over Iraqi Weapons,” C1)
Miller
is quoted in the article as saying by email that Chalabi “has provided most of
the front page exclusives on WMD to our paper.” She also says she has been
covering him for ten years. In other words, it is now openly admitted that one
major ‘source’ for the New York Times
of several of the bogus ‘intelligence’ items used by the White House as
justification for war with Iraq was Chalabi, previously affiliated with neocons
inside and outside the administration seeking war. The ‘intelligence streams’
used as the basis for war arguments were a closed circuit, used by the New York Times to produce reports that frequently appeared on its front
page.
Stumble It!