Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Google

This Month
July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
Year Archive
View Article  Robin Givhan Was Right: Hillary Clinton Was Reinventing Herself Again

The big lapses at the Washington Post closely parallel those of the Democratic Party establishment – enabling the non-vote count in election 2000, failing to investigate 9/11, and enabling the Iraq war.

It is telling, if somewhat ironic, that some establishment-type Dems are now at odds with the Post over a fashion article.The article, by the Post’s Pulitzer-winning Robin Givhan, was titled “Hillary Clinton’s Tentative Dip into New Neckline Territory.”

For the record, accusations that Givhan wrote about “body parts” are bogus. The article is not about body shape or size, and anyone who suggests that it ...   more »

View Article  On May 4, 2006, the Attorney General opened up access to DOJ criminal investigations to Cheney
The excellently well-prepared Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), probably one of the best Senators in Congress, offered up a real eye-opener in today's Senate Judiciary hearing. The hearing ostensibly dealt with politicization in the Department of Justice but provided little new regarding Gonzales.

Mean, harsh, repetitive and stupidly thuggy Sens Arlen "Bash Anita Hill" Specter (R-PA) and Chuck "check kiting" Schumer ("D"-NY) did their usual thing -- 90% wasting time, 10% good points or what should have been, and 100% self-dispay -- while as usual making me feel sorry for Gonzales.

Critics of the administration have good points to make, ...   more »
View Article  Sportcasters, gamblers, liars, plagiarizers and the treatment of Barry Bonds
As Barry Bonds approaches the record-breaking home run, some of our more respectable news media voices are joining the feeble bandwagon lumbering after Bonds to attack him. The Washington Post's Shankar Vedantam weighed in with faint praise and a superficially balanced appraisal of the treatment of Bonds in this week's "Department of Human Behavior," usually a pretty good column. Bob Schieffer weighed in with a not especially telling editorial on this week's Face the Nation.

The more volatile wing of the ape family, of course, is still carrying on its defamation of Bonds in connection with "steroids." Some ...   more »
View Article  McCarthyism and Partial Reporting

Soon after moving to the DC area, I recall hearing a particularly informed anecdote about Senator Joseph McCarthy of red-baiting ‘Communist conspiracy’ fame, the man who gave McCarthyism a bad name.

In McCarthy’s time there existed a government entity called the Legislative Reference Service, precursor to the present Congressional Research Service (CRS), which handles reference questions on an extensive range of topics for members of Congress and congressional staffers. Condensing for brevity, what happened was that McCarthy, already in full throat at the time, actually got in touch – quietly and behind the scenes -- with the then director of ...   more »

View Article  YouTube needs our help in the election: some help from Community Counts
Uncle Sam wants you. As most people with access to media know, YouTube has asked vox populi to submit questions for the Democratic presidential candidates on a televised debate (CNN) July 23. The problem is that while more than 1300 questions have been uploaded so far, according to a good article in the WashPost today, CNN's editors will choose the relatively few questions to ask the candidates.

Something of a bottleneck, there, especially considering the many ways CNN went along with the administration and facilitated its achievement of war with Iraq.

A web site named Community Counts has ...   more »
View Article  The GOP, excluding Ron Paul again
The email below, which went out to mailing lists including my PC, suggests strongly that the GOP is up to its old tricks again. According to the correspondent, the National Republican Senatorial Committee did not even include Ron Paul in its most recent mailing for a GOP presidential preference poll. These people don't want even their own supporters to vote.

The most entrenched figures in both major parties are doing their best to exclude most of our population from any genuine decision-making, but the GOP does it by far more thoroughly than even Dems like Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Schumer and ...   more »
View Article  Ms. Palfrey confirms that Mr. Burkman's business with her was escort service related
Other blogs are already all over this, but to clarify a bit more -- One of Deborah Jeane Palfrey’s outgoing calls (Sunday, January 15, 2006) was placed to an Arlington, Virginia, number listed to registered lobbyist/firm John M. (Jack) Burkman & Associates, 1530 Key Boulevard #1222, Arlington VA 22209. 

Chances of reaching Burkman himself are apparently slim and none, and slim’s out of town, as is Burkman. Other posts including Wonkette (today) have done good work regarding questions about Mr. Burkman already; naturally, quite a few people wonder why a lobbyist for ‘family values’ ...   more »

View Article  Update on yesterday's post, e-mails from Ms. Palfrey
Since yesterday's blog posting was about Deborah Jeane Palfrey's publicly released telephone records, it seems only fair today to post Ms. Palfrey's own words. The questions emailed to her attorneys concerned her outgoing phone calls on September 11, 2001.

Ms. Palfrey herself replied in two emails yesterday evening, first,

"Ms. Burns… I simply cannot remember such details.  –Sincerely, Jeane Palfrey"

and second,

"
Ms. Burns… what concern is my estate planning to you?  -Jeane Palfrey"

The latter pertains to the fact that one of the 9/11 calls was placed to a law firm. An attorney with the firm explains ...   more »
View Article  What the ‘DC Madam’ was doing on 9/11
My immediate question about those phone records of Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called ‘DC madam,’ was what if any interruption of business they would show for September 11, 2001. Results, judging from a quick search, predictable: little activity on 9/11 itself, then business roaring back to full steam ahead by the following week, then on to super revived activity the second weekend afterward, after the Stock Market had reopened, military and security contractors were ginning up, and we’re open for war, I mean business. 

First, though, Ms. Palfrey had her own domestic business to take care of. ...   more »

View Article  Keith Olbermann calls on Bush to resign

In a pretty spectacular peroration tonight, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann delivered a ten-minute indictment of the president and vice president and asked Bush to perform one last act of patriotism: resign. Saying “Even Richard Nixon knew it was time to resign” and adding that Nixon’s resignation, belated though it was, ranked as one final action of nonpartisanship, Olbermann urged George W. Bush to emulate Nixon, “not for self, not for party” but for the country. Olbermann also expressed a wish that Bush could get Cheney to resign.

Olbermann also prefaced his speech, in one of several promotional moments, with the comment ...   more »

View Article  A crook in the White House
The total commutation of Libby’s sentence should put an end to any questions, if any remain, about whether the Bush-Cheney cabal is completely crooked.

Briefly: the published statement for public consumption that the president found Libby’s sentence “excessive” is transparently false. If he had merely found the sentence excessive, he could have commuted it PARTLY. Two and a half years cd have been reduced to two, or to one and a half, or to one year. It cd have been drastically commuted to six months, or to three months.

That did not happen. Instead, George Walker Bush elevated Byron York over ...   more »

View Article  Presssure on the new Scots Prime Minister of Britain -- did US authorities have security concerns not passed along?

Very disappointing: It may have been a given that Gordon Brown’s accession as Prime Minister of Great Britain would be greeted with some new terror plots. – After all, Brown’s being welcomed as new British Prime Minister has been reported around the world as a repudiation of Tony Blair’s ‘Bush-poodle’ support for the war against Iraq. It was probably inevitable that any parties with a vested interest in sowing dissension and keeping Britain in Iraq would react accordingly. But I have to admit, I was hoping that those foiled plots reported on Friday were the extent of immediate reactions.

Far ...   more »