31Blog                  Leading to Iraq: High crimes and misdemeanors. Late March, 2002.

 

Continuation of blog series on the administration push to invade Iraq.

Fourth week of March, 2002:  

 

March 24, 2002 – Cheney makes the round of the Sunday morning talk shows, boosting antagonism with Iraq through the three-pronged argument of 9/11, WMD, and oil. He appears on the CBS talk program Face the Nation, interviewed by Bob Schieffer:

“SCHIEFFER: I want to begin with Iraq. You have just been to the Middle East. Did you leave that region feeling that Arab leaders would basically oppose an American action against Saddam Hussein?           

Vice Pres. CHENEY: No, not at all. What I came away with, Bob, is the sense that they share our concern, and that--that the--the notion of a Saddam Hussein with his great oil wealth, with his inventory that he already has of biological and chemical weapons, that he might actually acquire a nuclear weapon is, I think, a frightening proposition for anybody who thinks about it. And part of my task out there was to go out and begin the dialogue with our friends to make sure they were thinking about it.”

Actually, Schieffer has it right: heads of state in the nations bordering Iraq do not support a U.S. invasion of Iraq. Cheney has returned from his Middle East trip without any unequivocal show of support for a U.S. invasion from any regional leader, including Jordan’s King Hussein, he who used to joke that he was “between Iraq and a hard place.”

          Note that Cheney responds to this question, typically, first with an innocuous generality that “they share our concern,” and then with a segue into imaginary nuclear weapons.

 
Same day -- Cheney also appears on NBC’s Meet the Press with Tim Russert:

“MR. RUSSERT: The Middle East: Assess the situation.  
VICE PRES. CHENEY: Enormously important part of the world from the standpoint of the United States, enormously complex set of problems and issues that are all sort of interrelated; a sense of opportunity and danger, if you will, simultaneously. It's an area that we've got major commitments in, in terms of
U.S. military forces. I spent some time with our troops while I was out there, and they've done a magnificent job. The source of the terrorist attacks that hit us on September 11, also the source of one of the vital commodities we have to have to run our economy in terms of sort of the world's reserves of oil, so it's a big, important, complicated piece of business.

This is one of relatively few explicit, public mentions of oil as a factor during the administration push to war. Presumably when Cheney says “the source of the terrorist attacks that hit us on September 11,” he is referring to the entire Middle East, in response to Russert’s question. If so, this is also one of few relatively open acknowledgements from the administration that the region, the Middle East, rather than Saddam, is the source of the terrorist attacks.

 

Same day -- Cheney appears on CNN’s Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer:

“On the other side, he's bracketed by Iraq and Saddam Hussein. What I would say is that our friends in the region are equally concerned about the problems we see in Iraq, specifically the development of weapons of mass destruction by Saddam Hussein, his refusal to comply with the U.N. Security Council Resolution 687, which he signed up to at the end of the Gulf War, which said he would get rid of all his weapons of mass destruction.

BLITZER: Are you still committed to trying to get U.N. weapons inspection teams back into
Iraq? Because, as you know, some critics -- Senator Fred Thompson, for example -- said that would be a waste, that they're just going to give a runaround.    
CHENEY: What we said, Wolf, if you go back and look at the record is, the issue's not inspectors. The issue is that he has chemical weapons and he's used them. The issue is that he's developing and has biological weapons. The issue is that he's pursuing nuclear weapons.         

It's the weapons of mass destruction and what he's already done with them. There's a devastating story in this week's New Yorker magazine on his use of chemical weapons against the Kurds of northern Iraq back in 1988; may have hit as many 200 separate towns and villages. Killed upwards of 100,000 people, according to the article if it's to be believed.                  

This is a man of great evil, as the president said. And he is actively pursuing nuclear weapons at this time, and we think that's cause for concern for us and for everybody in the region. And I found during the course of my travels that it is indeed a problem of great concern for our friends out there as well too.”

 
Again, Cheney sticks to general statements that our friends in the region are concerned. He is back in
Washington unequipped with specific promises of support for invading Iraq from the Saudis and other rulers.

 

March 25, 2002 – The Directorate of Operations in CIA issues its “third and final report on the Iraq-Niger uranium issue.”

http://wid.ap.org/documents/libbytrial/jan24/DX64.pdf

 
All signs indicate that the CIA effectively tries to wash its hands of the uranium issue, since with good reason it has remained unimpressed by the evidence of that purported Iraq-Niger uranium deal. Given how long the CIA delayed acquiring the documents, the agency must have known or surmised early on that they were not going to pan out as proofs.

 

Same day – Just hours before a deadline imposed by the courts in a lawsuit brought by conservation groups and others, the Department of Energy releases thousands of pages of documents from the administration’s energy task force, spearheaded by Vice President Cheney. Thousands of documents are missing; many others are partly blacked out. But even the incomplete documents reveal that the administration met in spring 2001 only with representatives of the oil industry, not with environmental organizations of consumer advocates. According to Judicial Watch, the thousands of missing documents include emails.

The net effect of this document dump, while downplayed somewhat by the media in the national capital, is to undercut the White House and OVP public push to war.

 

March 29, 2002 – Gen. Franks meets with the Joint Chiefs of Staff. They discuss stepped-up air patrols and air strikes against Iraq, a “Spike Plan.” Some question remains as to whether this 'spike' against Iraq is more a part of the stepping up of hostilities against Iraq, or a short-term tactic intended to placate the White House and the Office of the Vice President in their drive for a war the U.S. Army does not want.