Summer 2001. The
administration appears to be in a holding pattern, with little direct action
taken against
June, 2001:
June 1, 2001
– The United Nations Security Council passes Resolution 1352, hailed by State
Department spokesman Richard Boucher as “a substantial achievement for the
Council . . . It means the international community once again is united in its
view of Iraq and what we need to do.” The resolution
maintains the Oil for Food program, but with tighter controls.
Same day
-- Iraq halts its oil exports in a
dispute with the United Nations, arousing fears of a spike in oil prices with
gas prices in the U.S. already high.
June 5,
2001 – The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Directorate for Analysis and
Production issues DI policy No. 005, a policy memo which
recognizes the value of ideas and concepts that run counter to the prevailing
wisdom, by establishing a process within the Intelligence Community for using
alternative judgments.
Under the heading “SUBJECT:
Alternative Judgments Policy,” the memo “establishes a process for promulgating
alternative judgments, consonant with the rights and responsibilities of all analysts
to provide the best possible analysis. . .
The first and preferred method for incorporating an
analytic alternative is through the standard process of coordination. Analysts
are expected to coordinate their facts, build coherent arguments, and defend
those arguments while coordinating with other experts across the Intelligence
Community . . . In those rare instances where analysts build a strong case, but
cannot achieve consensus support for their analysis, an alternative judgment is
justified.”
According to State’s press briefing, the money is
to be allocated during an audit is on the allocations:
“Q: Will this money be disbursed before the audit
is complete?
MR. REEKER: We anticipate that the new money will
be used to continue the programs already ongoing . . .
I guess what you are referring to is the Office of
Inspector General's audit of grants and contracts. And as Ambassador Boucher
said a couple of days ago, this is very much a routine audit. This is the kind
of thing that goes on. It is therefore routine that a grantee, like the Iraqi National
Congress, would continue to receive funding and support while the audit is
being performed because, as we said, the goal of the audit and the expectation
of the audit is to provide us then with recommendations on how to improve the
Iraqi National Congress's management of its programs and accounts, and
anticipate that that will actually enhance more their ability to
Q: You haven't answered the question, though. The
question was will this money be disbursed to the INC before the audit is
complete. You seem to be saying want to say yes, but you didn't
MR. REEKER: Well, I can't tell you when the audit
is going to be complete, first of all. That is up to the Inspector General, and
the Inspector General
Q: I mean, is the audit in any way an obstacle to
the disbursement of the [gap in transcript]
MR. REEKER: No. There we go. We answered your
question. No. I thought that was pretty clear, Jonathan.
Q: So this is simply the money that when that was
explained to us to help them keep going while the audit is being done and while
the other money, or other additional money, is suspended?
MR. REEKER: Right. As you know, there is a pot of
money and it gets drawn upon, and we notify Congress when we intend to obligate
the money, thereby drawing upon that money.
Q: Where does this pot of money come from?
Q: Under the rainbow. [laughter]”
“Q Why
do you think the President is sagging in the polls? And is there any concern over here about that? And
in particular, the indications that many average Americans don't think he
shares their concerns.
MR. FLEISCHER: Ron,
let me say this as clearly as I can. I just dismiss the premise of the
question. On the same day that a Reuters-AP poll came out, for example,
came out that showed the President has a 60-percent job approval. The fact of
the matter is that the President's numbers have been solid and stable. And
the President, having emerged from a very close, one of the closest elections
ever in the history of the
Depending on what poll you want
to look at, his job approval is anywhere between 50 percentage points and 60
percentage points. The fluctuation is minuscule. Some days it goes
up, some days it goes down. But the President has emerged from one of the
closest elections in American history to have received solid support from the
American people.”
Stumble It!