Leading to Iraq: High crimes and misdemeanors. February 16, 2001 through February 28, 2001.
Feb. 16, 2001 – Controversial Iraqi exile
leader Ahmad Chalabi meets with Edward Walker, Assistant Secretary of State for
Near East affairs, in Washington, D.C. Chalabi later says that he has
been authorized to spend over $30 million in U.S. funds for operations mainly
inside Iraq. The policy of supporting Iraqi
resistance groups is intensely advocated by new SecDef Rumsfeld and his deputy
Wolfowitz. Chalabi’s group, the Iraqi National Congress (INC), received little
money under Clinton via the 1998 Iraq Liberation
Act.
Same day
-- On the same date as the Chalabi meeting, about 50 U.S. and British jets bomb
radar and other sites around Baghdad. A wave of F-15 and F/A 18 fighter bombers
takes off from the aircraft carrier USS Harry S Truman, in the Persian Gulf. Aerial refuellers,
command-and-control planes and electronic jammers take off from bases in Kuwait and Bahrain, joined by four RAF Tornado jets
from the Ali Al-Salem base in Kuwait flying into Iraqi airspace over
southern Iraq.
All planes return safely after seventy minutes, having
taken out five anti-aircraft sites on the outskirts of Baghdad with AGM-130 bombs. The
administration sidesteps international law on invading Iraq's airspace by using guided
missiles loosed from up to 50 miles away on the fringe of the no-fly zones.
(“The
Family Business,” THE SCOTSMAN, Feb. 18, 2001)
Feb. 16, 2001 – White
House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer defends the U.S. air strikes against Iraq:
“Q Did something happen to provoke
this, Ari, did some incident happen to provoke this?
MR.
FLEISCHER: It was the existence of radar facilities that posed a
threat to our aircraft, that identified our aircraft. There is a
simultaneous briefing going on at the Pentagon as we speak. The
Pentagon is briefing at 2:30 p.m. and will provide additional
detailed information about the strikes and about the targets.
Q For the President to have specifically approved it
indicates it's more than just a routine thing, though, because rules of
engagement --
MR. FLEISCHER: No, it
is routine. In this case, the aircraft would be on patrol in the
southern no-fly zone, and that's why it required the President's
authorization. That has happened before; that is, unfortunately,
routine.
Q Do we know whether these were newly-constructed radar?
MR.
FLEISCHER: DOD will be taking that.”
Transcripts of White House press conferences show that
American and foreign reporters in the White House press corps have actually
asked hundreds of good questions over recent years. Unfortunately, any question
perceived as critical or negative, regardless of the importance or gravity of
the topic, has been treated by the television networks as though it were
propaganda, and the public has by and large not been allowed to see and hear it
broadcast on national evening news. The networks were influenced into this
practice by savage and well-funded assaults of the ‘noise machine’ against
so-called ‘liberal media.’
The February, 2001, air strikes against Iraq serve the purpose of testing the
U.S. media response. The probe effectively reveals
that indeed, administration moves against Iraq will meet with little or no widespread
scrutiny. At the beginning of the Bush administration, media attention on the
White House is largely focused on bogus stories about the outgoing Clinton
administration like the ‘missing W’ typewriters, and on new personnel
appointments, but with little reporting that so many new people want war with
Iraq.
Feb. 21, 2001 -- Bush nominates John R. Bolton
as Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security Affairs, Dept of
State. Bolton, who later leads the
administration’s opposition to an International Criminal Court, had been a
director of PNAC, also signed the 1998 PNAC letter calling for regime change in
Iraq and is another longtime neoconservative hawk. He
will later be appointed to an interim position as U.S. Ambassador to the United
Nations.
Feb. 28, 2001 – The Senate confirms Paul
Wolfowitz as Deputy Secretary of Defense. Wolfowitz says at his confirmation hearing that U.S. national interests would be best served
by unseating Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.