Continuing from previous blogs . . . Whether the youthful, half-educated skyjackers knew it themselves or not, on a September 11 they were destined to fly in the U.S. into a virtual perfect storm of war games, scenario simulations and military operations that would tend to give them extra cover. September 11 – code named “911” -- is by way of being the traditional date, on or about, for such exercises.

 

It is the opinion of this writer that most of the 19 were less likely than their backers to be directly aware of this little item of U.S. military preparedness. Probably the head of Saudi intelligence knew it, as would other heads of foreign intelligence services including Pakistan’s ISI. Whether some of the hijackers had gleaned this fact through U.S. military training is a point upon which the Pentagon so far has not enlightened us. In my opinion, Bush’s permitting (or ordering) Pentagon stonewalling on the matter is further ground for impeachment of the president and vice president as well for removal of Rumsfeld as SecDef.

 

In any case, a fact not in dispute is that the terrorists’ strikes occurred simultaneously with several previously scheduled military simulations.

 

Anyone wishing to review the ground/known facts would do well to begin with the excellent compilations of research and theory at Wikipedia and Oil Empire and Cooperative Research.

 

An imposing lineup of exercises and operations was scheduled on or around 9/11:

  • Richard Clarke mentions early in his book Against All Enemies that an exercise called “Vigilant Warrior” was taking place on September 11.
  • A San Francisco Chronicle article reported in August 2002 that, in what unnamed officials called a “bizarre coincidence,” the National Reconnaissance Office planned an exercise for September 11 in which a small plane would crash into a headquarters building.
  • An exercise called “Operation Northern Vigilance,” deploying fighter jets to Alaska and Canada, was planned for September 11 but was called off when the hijackings were recognized, as reported in the Toronto Star, December 2001.
  • The invaluable compilation Cooperative Research includes “Operation Northern Guardian”: “In late August 2001, two-thirds of the 27th Fighter Squadron are sent overseas. Six of the squadron’s fighters and 115 people go to Turkey to enforce the no-fly zone over northern Iraq as part of Operation Northern Watch. Another six fighters and 70 people are sent to Iceland to participate in “Operation Northern Guardian.” The fighter groups will not return to Langley until early December. [Flyer, 7/1/2003]”
  • In early 2002, Newhouse News Service reported that “Sept. 11 was Day II of "Vigilant Guardian," an exercise that would pose an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defense outposts nationwide.” NORAD was conducting a week-long simulation, interrupted by the actual attacks.
  • “Vigilant Guardian” was conducted simultaneously with and as part of “Global Guardian,” an annual exercise involving NORAD, the United States Strategic Command and the Air Force Space Command.
  • Tripod II,” a joint exercise of FEMA and the DOJ, was scheduled for September 12 in New York. It was a biowarfare vaccination exercise, as revealed by Mayor Giuliani later – typical of these cats that they would give free and taxpayer-sponsored publicity to Judith Miller’s book Germs, just released – and was canceled when the attacks occurred.

 

On top of the foregoing, there were further indications of the expensively hyped up militaristic tensions in the U.S., with Bush installed in office. As I have cited before, along with the plane-into-a-building exercise planned by the NRO, there were other, smaller preparations for September 11:

·        A course called "Homeland Security," conducted by Colonel Randall Larsen, was offered in fall 2001 at the NationalWarCollege in Washington, DC. According to his biography, Col. Larsen "previously served as the Chairman of the Department of Military Strategy and Operations at the NationalWarCollege where he continues to teach the Homeland Security course. He has also served as a government advisor to the Defense Science Board . . . During the past eight years, he has written and lectured extensively on the subjects of asymmetric and biological warfare, and the 21st century challenges of homeland security."  He is also Director of the Anser Institute for Homeland Security, part of Analytic Services, Inc, headquartered in northern Virginia. By coincidence, the first lecture in the 'Homeland Security' course was scheduled for September 11. By no coincidence at all, Stephen Hadley, Deputy National Security Adviser under Condoleezza Rice when 9/11 hit and now National Security Adviser, joined the Bush administration from the board of ANSER, where he had been a trustee. Thus we now have a Cabinet department, for the first time in U.S. history, named after a corporation: ANSER’s “homeland security institute” had been in existence since 1999. ANSER is also a mainly one-client (government) security and systems contractor.

·        Richard Falkenrath, an Assistant Professor of Public Policy on leave from Harvard and "principal investigator in the Jeddah Project, funded out of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia" according to his biography, authored a book titled 'America's Achilles' Heel' (1998), on terrorism. By coincidence, the book was scheduled to be taught on Sept. 11, 2001, in a course on terrorism offered by instructor Jason Pate at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, part of the Monterey (California) Institute for International Studies, with branches in DC and Kazakhstan.

Mr. Pate, who has an AB from Stanford in International Relations and a Master's degree in Public Management from the University of Maryland, is frequently cited along with Col. Larsen as an interviewee on terrorism.

 

Other writers have commented upon the 9/11 Commission’s facile conclusion that the simulations, operations and war games on and around September 11 did not deter appropriate and effective response. (See the Wikipedia entry, linked above.) I think the Commission’s conclusion is over-optimistic.

 

Important as are the questions about response, there are also other concerns about this swarm of seasonal military simulations and operations: the possibility should be mooted that they amounted to an engraved invitation to take advantage of the system. It should be obvious – given the way nominally rival militaries and intelligence services live in each other’s pockets – that some of the best information about these war games and other maneuvers was liable to be held by the military-security complexes of other nations. It should also be obvious that no amount of repression by a repressive regime suffices to prevent information leaking through a general population inimical either to the regime itself or to its allies. Not that the timing of these exercises and operations was much of a secret – except from U.S. media outlets uninterested in them.

 

Back on the domestic front, it must be noted that all these simulations not only did not prevent or deter an actual attack, they may have assisted it. And much prior to the date of 9/11, they also contributed to what amounted to an ongoing campaign to make attack seem inevitable – so much so that top-level experts on military security in government and media not only devoted little time to questions about how the attacks happened, but also had apparently so felt them to be inevitable that they devoted comparatively few resources to preventing them.

 

Back in the day, we would have called this mediocrity at best. But you wouldn’t know it from the way these guys rake in corporate speaking fees and/or government contracts.