The full transcript of Condoleezza Rice’s statement on “transformational” moves to reshuffle the State Dept is here:

http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2006/59306.htm

 

As is typical for Bush plants in the administration, Rice gets in a dig at and an implied falsehood about well qualified people, in this instance at State, she is ostensibly praising:

“Finally, to advance transformational diplomacy, we are preparing our people with new expertise and challenging them with new expectations. I've been Secretary of State for almost exactly one year now, and in that time I have become more convinced than ever that we have the finest diplomatic service in the world. I've seen the noble spirit of that service, a service that defines the men and women of our Foreign Service and Civil Service and our Foreign Service Nationals, many of whom are serving in dangerous places far away from their families.

I see in them the desire and the ability to adapt to a changing world and to our changing diplomatic mission. More and more often, over the course of this new century, we will ask the men and women of the State Department to be active in the field. We will need them to engage with private citizens in emerging regional centers, not just with government officials in their nations' capitals. We must train record numbers of people to master difficult languages like Arabic and Chinese and Farsi and Urdu.

In addition, to advance in their careers, our Foreign Service Officers must now serve in what we call hardship posts. [emphasis added] These are challenging jobs in critical countries like Iraq and Afghanistan and Sudan and Angola, countries where we are working with foreign citizens in difficult conditions to maintain security and fight poverty and make democratic reforms.”

But the truth is, of course, that Foreign Service Officers ALREADY “serve in what we call hardship posts.”

 

Rotation of service is standard procedure in the State Department. State already transfers people around the globe; it is considered desirable that personnel develop expertise, but it is also considered desirable that they not get too entrenched. And hardship posts are already part of the career ladder at State. (As regards India, BTW, New Delhi already had one of the world’s biggest U.S. embassies 25 years ago.)

 

In short, transfers and hardship posts for U.S. diplomatic personnel are not a “new” move on the part of the Bush administration.

 

It might be a good idea to try to figure out why some of State's best qualified people are being fleered at indirectly.