Now comes information that the putative typewriter expert or computer expert who attacked the National Guard memos shown by CBS is not a font or typewriting specialist, but just an activist GOP lawyer in a Bush-connected Atlanta law firm:

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/2004/la-091704buckhead_lat,1,494535.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Kudos to the Los Angeles Times for printing this information.  High time somebody did.

 

I didn’t pay much attention to the initial GOP accusation of “forgeries.” It was the typical knee-jerk attack, and rather lame at that.  Then the Washington Post gave the ridiculous allegations an artificial respectability and prominence on its front page, as a “controversy” over the memos.  Journalistic envy, competitiveness and insecurity may be in the picture here; CBS acquired documents that the Post’s investigative aces should have acquired, preferably before 2000, when George Dubya Bush was supposedly being vetted as a candidate (for PRESIDENT?!?).

 

CBS, to its credit, posted the four memos on its web site: 

 

www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay4.pdf

 

www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay19.pdf

 

www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardaugust1.pdf

 

www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardaugust18.pdf

 

Belatedly scrutinizing the memos themselves, I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry.  I personally have written and typed since high school, though not often for newspapers before 1996; I have typed thousands of pages for myself and other people; I used a series of IBM Selectric typewriters, beginning in the 1970s, before switching to the computer.  My second-to-last "word processor" had a memory so large, a vertical tower, that I used it as a typewriter stand (it created an  –st and –th suffix after numbers, by the way); I still have an IBM Selectric III sitting on the floor of an upstairs room with other storage, which I use occasionally for addressing envelopes.  I don’t like using it, because its lines are wavering and its font spacing is uneven, as in the memos.  There is no realistic possibility that these memos are computer-generated.

 

Let me repeat that.  THERE IS NO REALISTIC POSSIBILITY THAT THESE MEMOS ARE COMPUTER-GENERATED.  Their wavering lines, the inconsistent spacing between letters, the stuck-key spacing between some words all indicate a typewriter keyboard, and I know the feeling.

 

Furthermore, Lt. Colonel Killian’s longtime secretary appeared on last week’s Sixty Minutes to confirm the content in the memos.  (Oh yes, the content – remember that?)   She also confirmed the content in an interview with the New York Times.  She said she did not type them herself – and indeed they show signs of amateur rather than professional typing (not executive-secretary quality), particularly the three shortest memos.  Perhaps those were typed by the late Col. Killian himself, using the one-finger method.  It wouldn’t be the only time in history that someone went into his office on a Saturday and typed what his eighty-six-year-old former secretary, Marian Carr Knox, called a “cover-your-behind memo.”

 

The Bush campaign is toeing a thin line, here.  They can count on the fact that only half of households in America are online, and anyone not online will have trouble seeing the memos.  They're also facing the unwelcome fact, however, that many  not-online households have pink-collar workers with typing experience similar to mine, on a series of word processors.  The administration just has to hope that a lot of women never see the memos.