Setting up the sucker punch

 

 

As I’ve written before, I still believe the authority figures who told us ...   more »

5 things you need to know on Election Day, from the League of Women Voters

 

 

Top Five Risks ...   more »

Elson and other experts have wondered, repeatedly, what kind of administration invades Iraq in the guise of warring against terrorism, killing innocent women and children -- but will not take slight steps to improve security at home.    more »

One good reason not to rush into an intelligence “reform” is that bogus reforms harm exactly the persons and causes ...   more »

Three years post-9/11, the news is not all good. While some individuals in government and outside it are working diligently to protect and defend, the over-all security apparatus is as much façade as structure.   more »

Three years after 9/11, the Bush administration is still more intent on exploiting tragedy than on preventing it. Kerry and Edwards cannot point this out. But I can.   more »

The fact that most reveals the true obscenity of Bush’s Iraq war is that Saddam’s biggest customers were the US...   more »

Another in an ongoing series on aviation security, or the lack thereof, under an administration doing more to exploit tragedy than to prevent it.   more »

Well before 9/11, aviation security experts repeatedly warned three successive administrations -- Bush, Clinton, Bush -- about lapses, flaws, and ...   more »

Targeted Assassinations in Baghdad?

 

 

In today’s news from the Associated Press, two Sunni Muslim clerics have been assassinated in Baghdad.  The full AP report does not seem to be widely available in the US, so here are some facts quoted:

 

• Gunmen killed a Sunni cleric who was entering a mosque in Baghdad to perform noon prayers Monday in the second attack on a cleric belonging to the influential Association of Muslim Scholars, the group said.
  The cleric, Sheik Mohammed Jadoa al-Janabi, was killed in Baghdad's predominantly Shiite al-Baya neighborhood. He was unarmed and had no security guards.
  "It was a cleric coming to a mosque," said one official who spoke on condition of anonymity. "There was no need for a bodyguard."

 

• Late Sunday, gunmen attacked the car of another cleric, Sheik Hazem al-Zeidi, after he left a mosque in Baghdad's eastern slum of Sadr City, said Sheik Abdul-Sattar Abdul-Jabbar, a senior member of the group. The cleric was killed and two bodyguards were taken hostage. The guards were later released unharmed.

 

• The association is a conservative group that has worked for the release of foreign hostages. It strongly opposes the U.S. presence in Iraq - an outspoken view that has made it possible to act as an intermediary in hostage negotiations.
  The French ambassador to Iraq and a special envoy have repeatedly traveled to a west Baghdad mosque to meet with association leaders to discuss the fate of two French reporters abducted here last month.
  Ambassador Bernard Bajolet has publicly praised the clerics' condemnation of the kidnapping and their efforts to secure the journalists' release.

 

Also:

• I t was not immediately known who was behind the gunning-down of two Sunni clerics Sunday night and Monday in Baghdad.
  The two clerics belonged to the Association of Muslim Scholars, a grouping of conservative clerics that opposes the U.S. presence in Iraq and has emerged as a powerful representative of Iraq's Sunni minority.
  The association is believed to have contacts with Sunni insurgents, though it denies any links with them. It has interceded often in the past to win the release of foreign hostages, and militant groups have asked the association for a religious ruling on whether kidnappings and killing of hostages are permitted.
  
• The previous night, gunmen kidnapped Sheik Hazem al-Zeidi and two of his bodyguards as he left a mosque in another largely Shiite neighborhood of Baghdad, Sadr City. Al-Zeidi was killed and the bodyguards were released Monday, the association said.
• A few clerics from the association have been killed in the past - most recently in February. But the motives in those and the latest slayings have been unclear.
•  The association rose to prominence as the champion of Iraq's Sunni Arabs when its leaders played a key role in organizing taking relief supplies to Fallujah in April, when it was besieged by U.S. Marines.
  The association's leaders routinely criticize the government of Interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi and call for the departure of American and other foreign troops in Iraq.
• However, one of its key members, Sheik Ahmed Abdul-Ghafour Al-Samarie, may have angered insurgents by criticizing attacks against Iraqi police that left dozens dead last week. Al-Samarie said the attacks should instead be directed against foreign troops - not Iraqi civilians.
• The group may have also raised the ire of the militants by failing to act as yet on calls to issue a fatwa, or religious edict, sanctioning the kidnapping of foreigners.”

 

The big question here, obviously considered though not stated overtly by the AP reporters, is whether Baghdad’s “cycle of violence” is entirely random.  Look at which assassinations have succeeded:  UN employees, humanitarian aid workers from other countries, and now members of a group that worked successfully for the release of Western hostages in Iraq.  Also, the Iraqi Union of University Professors has reported that more than 250 college professors have been targets of assassination since April 30, 2003.  (Maybe they would be safer, under any Bush-approved regime, without the word “union” in their name.)

 

Seriously, surely it is unthinkable that any Special Ops or other Intelligence Community-connected Americans are engaging directly in targeted assassinations – not of terrorists but of persons who show signs of being able to deal effectively with terrorism.  Surely no player of the “great game” would thus endanger the lives of everyone around, including other Americans.

 

Surely it is unthinkable that the IC is selectively permitting some assassinations to succeed, while successfully protecting such as Hamid Karzai (Afghanistan’s US-connected head).

 

Right? – But one cannot help thinking that an actual democracy in Iraq might reduce the administration’s control of oil from there.  After all, a genuine democracy, or even a reasonable substitute, would be free to negotiate with all customers rather than with just the US, to sell oil.  Right? -- US oil companies were Saddam’s biggest customers.  They might not be the biggest consumers of Iraqi crude under some hypothetical future regime.

 

 

Now comes information that the putative typewriter expert or computer expert who attacked the National Guard memos shown by CBS is not a font or typewriting specialist, but just an activist GOP lawyer in a Bush-connected Atlanta law firm:

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/2004/la-091704buckhead_lat,1,494535.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Kudos to the Los Angeles Times for printing this information.  High time somebody did.

 

I didn’t pay much attention to the initial GOP accusation of “forgeries.” It was the typical knee-jerk attack, and rather lame at that.  Then the Washington Post gave the ridiculous allegations an artificial respectability and prominence on its front page, as a “controversy” over the memos.  Journalistic envy, competitiveness and insecurity may be in the picture here; CBS acquired documents that the Post’s investigative aces should have acquired, preferably before 2000, when George Dubya Bush was supposedly being vetted as a candidate (for PRESIDENT?!?).

 

CBS, to its credit, posted the four memos on its web site: 

 

www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay4.pdf

 

www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay19.pdf

 

www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardaugust1.pdf

 

www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardaugust18.pdf

 

Belatedly scrutinizing the memos themselves, I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry.  I personally have written and typed since high school, though not often for newspapers before 1996; I have typed thousands of pages for myself and other people; I used a series of IBM Selectric typewriters, beginning in the 1970s, before switching to the computer.  My second-to-last "word processor" had a memory so large, a vertical tower, that I used it as a typewriter stand (it created an  –st and –th suffix after numbers, by the way); I still have an IBM Selectric III sitting on the floor of an upstairs room with other storage, which I use occasionally for addressing envelopes.  I don’t like using it, because its lines are wavering and its font spacing is uneven, as in the memos.  There is no realistic possibility that these memos are computer-generated.

 

Let me repeat that.  THERE IS NO REALISTIC POSSIBILITY THAT THESE MEMOS ARE COMPUTER-GENERATED.  Their wavering lines, the inconsistent spacing between letters, the stuck-key spacing between some words all indicate a typewriter keyboard, and I know the feeling.

 

Furthermore, Lt. Colonel Killian’s longtime secretary appeared on last week’s Sixty Minutes to confirm the content in the memos.  (Oh yes, the content – remember that?)   She also confirmed the content in an interview with the New York Times.  She said she did not type them herself – and indeed they show signs of amateur rather than professional typing (not executive-secretary quality), particularly the three shortest memos.  Perhaps those were typed by the late Col. Killian himself, using the one-finger method.  It wouldn’t be the only time in history that someone went into his office on a Saturday and typed what his eighty-six-year-old former secretary, Marian Carr Knox, called a “cover-your-behind memo.”

 

The Bush campaign is toeing a thin line, here.  They can count on the fact that only half of households in America are online, and anyone not online will have trouble seeing the memos.  They're also facing the unwelcome fact, however, that many  not-online households have pink-collar workers with typing experience similar to mine, on a series of word processors.  The administration just has to hope that a lot of women never see the memos.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The subway and train station near my home provide examples of how the administration “tax cut” works.  Parking at ...   more »

As I have said, I think the reason Bush had no "exit plan" for Iraq is that he never planned ...   more »

“Outgoing commander questions U.S. strategy on Falluja”

 

This is the report that should have led off today’s evening network ...   more »

Our profiteering First Family, and why it isn’t more reported

 

 

Never before in the history of this nation ...   more »

 

There are some ironies in the GOP’s targeting “trial lawyers,” aside from the obvious.

 

Don’t get me wrong; ...   more »

Alert to public and press:  experts have information for the 9/11 Commission

 

National Security Experts Speak Out: 9/11 ...   more »

Harking way back to the dead of winter, when the Howard Dean campaign was assaulted by CNN and by a ...   more »

This blog is a slightly rewritten version of an article I started when I was clearing out and cleaning my ...   more »

White House “energy policy,” continued:

 

 

Following through from yesterday’s blog -- Anyone who delves into the White House’s ...   more »

One thing you’re forced to recognize, leafing through reports from 2001, is that when the Bush White House talked about ...   more »

Following a lead provided by the Tombstone Tumbleweed, I recently published a short article on the many “OTMs,” i.e. “Other ...   more »

Aviation Security on Friends:  When Will the Bush Team Start Working on Security?

 

 

Perhaps not everyone ...   more »