|
|
|||||||
|
Login
This Month
Month Archive
|
Thursday, December 16
by
margieburns
on Thu 16 Dec 2004 09:11 AM CST
[I am passing along the request below in hopes it will help:]
Greetings,
1. If you are an attorney, ... more »
by
margieburns
on Thu 16 Dec 2004 08:55 AM CST
Sometimes it takes a youthful perspective to sum up a complex phenomenon. Ever since All this is mystifying, as mentioned. But all that in turn still leaves an even bigger question unanswered, because it is never asked: The key question is why Giuliani should be getting kudos just because it was his watch on which 9/11 happened, in the first place. As one young person commented, it’s rather like having the principal of Of course, the Columbine principal would never have done such a thing. He would have had, and did have, too much taste and judgment. But our personnel now in the White House are not being held to any standard of taste and judgment. That puts it in a nutshell. In fact, it’s such a good point that we have to wonder why, or how, the media got stampeded into failing to recognize it in the first place. In any previous administration, the highest-placed officials would have been held immediately responsible for anything even remotely like the events of that fateful day. Instead, we have an administration that has most recently awarded our highest civilian honors to officials in the most tainted sectors of GWBush policy: “intelligence,” the Actually, of course, Giuliani didn’t come out smelling like a rose in Speaking of that, Bush’s remarkable nomination of Bernard Kerik to head “homeland security” is a real giveaway. Space constraints prohibit even a brief run-through of Kerik’s track record here today, but stay tuned. The nomination at least unveils the extent of administration carelessness in the realm of protecting and defending. |
Radio Left Blogging Network
Stumble It!
Search
Search
Login
Recent Trackbacks
Recent Comments
|
|||||
Stumble It!